Has your university asked you to use Chicago referencing? And have they completely failed to explain what this means, leaving you confused and upset?
Then you’ve come to the right place! In this post, we offer a quick overview of Chicago referencing, including how to cite sources in an essay.
Chicago referencing is drawn from the Chicago Manual of Style, a style guide published by the University of Chicago Press. As well as citations, it covers writing style and formatting documents.
However, since it’s designed as a guide to American English, most UK universities that use Chicago referencing focus on the rules for citing sources.
Because life is rarely simple, Chicago referencing actually offers two methods of citing sources: author-date citations (popular in the sciences) and footnotes (common in the humanities).
The author–date version uses in-text citations, with the author’s name and the year of publication for a source given in parentheses (along with page numbers if quoting something directly):
The choice of questions in science depends on many factors (Gruen 1996).
The footnote version, meanwhile, indicates citations with superscript numbers (e.g. 1, 2, 3) in the main text. These are accompanied by full source information in a footnote:
1. Lori Gruen, ‘Gendered Knowledge’, in Readings in Animal Cognition, ed. Mark Bekoff and Dale Jamieson (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996), 20.
The footnote version also gives you the option of either:
However, most universities prefer you to use both full notes and a bibliography. For more on the shortened footnote format, see the ‘Repeat Citations’ section below.
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
As well as citations, Chicago referencing requires listing all sources at the end of your document. This section should be titled ‘Reference List’ if using author–date citations or ‘Bibliography’ if using footnotes. In either case, the format to use is as follows:
There’s also a difference between the two versions of Chicago referencing in terms of how sources are presented. This relates to the position of the date in references.
With the author–date system, the year of publication comes after the author’s name:
Gruen, Lori. 1996. ‘Gendered Knowledge’. In Readings in Animal Cognition, edited by Mark Bekoff and Dale Jamieson, 17-27. Cambridge: MIT Press.
With the footnotes and bibliography version, however, it comes at the end of the reference:
Gruen, Lori. ‘Gendered Knowledge’. In Readings in Animal Cognition, edited by Mark Bekoff and Dale Jamieson, 17-27. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.
With the author–date system, repeat citations of the same source involve giving the same in-text citation each time (although with different page numbers if citing different parts of the text).
With the footnote version, though, there are special rules for repeat citations. Instead of repeating the full source information, you should just give the author’s surname, a shortened version of the title, and page numbers. In practice, this would look something like the following:
1. Lori Gruen, ‘Gendered Knowledge’, in Readings in Animal Cognition, ed. Mark Bekoff and Dale Jamieson (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996), 20. 2. Gruen, ‘Gendered Knowledge’, 18.
This helps keep notes concise and prevents repetition.
Δ
5-minute read
Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...
6-minute read
If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...
9-minute read
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....